GB/T 44717-2024 民用無人機(jī)可靠性飛行試驗(yàn)要求與方法

Requirements and methods for reliability flight test of civil unmanned aerial vehicles

GB/T 38918-2020 民用飛機(jī)起落架結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)與仿真

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了民用飛機(jī)起落架結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)的基本要求、詳細(xì)要求和仿真要求。 本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于民用飛機(jī)起落架（以下簡稱起落架）結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)及仿真，其他飛機(jī)可參考使用。

Civil airplane landing gear structure design and simulation

GB/T 29075-2012 航天器概率風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估程序

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了航天器概率風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估(PRA)的一般要求、總體流程和實(shí)施程序、本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于定量評估航天器的系統(tǒng)、分系統(tǒng)及設(shè)備的安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)或任務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、

Probabilistic risk assessment procedure for spacecrafts

MH/T 9004-2013 飛機(jī)燃油系統(tǒng)及部件的結(jié)冰試驗(yàn)

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了飛機(jī)燃油系統(tǒng)和部件結(jié)冰試驗(yàn)用的設(shè)備和材料、燃油的選擇及試驗(yàn)方法。本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于使用噴氣式發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的固定翼飛機(jī)在其運(yùn)行環(huán)境條件下的飛機(jī)燃油系統(tǒng)和部件的結(jié)冰試驗(yàn)。

Aircraft fuel system and component icing test

IEC 107/161/DTS:2011 IEC/TS 62239-1(第一版):航空電子設(shè)備工藝管理.管理方案.第1部分:電子部件管理計(jì)劃的制備和維護(hù)

IEC/TS 62239-1, Ed. 1: Process management for avionics - Management plan - Part 1: Preparation and maintenance of an electronic components management plan

SAE AS6029-2011 用于飛行安全性的激光控制措施性能標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

This document provides guidance for laser operators and aviation authorities to determine the performance criteria that laser hazard control measures shall meet for the operation of an outdoor laser system in navigable airspace. The document does not cover systems intended to deliberately aim and or track lasers at aircraft except for FAA approved purposes, such as visual warning systems, search and rescue, etc. Aircraft operations to be protected include all types that can be reasonably expected to operate in the affected area, which are traveling at speeds and altitudes defined in the Performance/Functional Requirements section. This document does not address all possible aircraft operations, (e.g. the operation of stealth, high-speed (> Mach 1), unmanned aircraft systems, aircraft above 60 000 feet MSL, etc.), including aircraft operating under a waiver from FAA regulations. Depending on the laser system's location and operational characteristics, the proponent may be required to coordinate with local military facilities and with the USAF Space Command. The military may request additional requirements (such as limitations on lasing hours or locations), or they may take actions to avoid the laser location. The purpose of this document is to specify performance criteria standards for control measures to ensure the safe incorporation of lasers propagated into the navigable airspace.

Performance Criteria for Laser Control Measures Used for Aviation Safety

AECMA TR 3198-2005 航空航天系列.制造商鑒定組合標(biāo)記EN航空產(chǎn)品鑒定

This Technical Report lists the monograms and marks which identify manufacturers of EN aerospace products.

Aerospace Manufacturers' Identification Monograms and Marks for EN Aerospace Products Serie Aerospatiale Monogrammes Et Marques D'Identification

AECMA PREN 9162-2005 航空航天系列.操作自我查證.P1版

The focus of Operator Self-Verification is on traditional manufacturing operations, and applications can be made wherever traditional inspection is employed. The practices recommended in this document are intended to identify the basic elements and provide a “guideline” for structuring Operator Self-Verification programs within the aerospace industry; applicable to producers of commercial and military aircraft and weapons platforms, space vehicles, and all related hardware, software, electronics, engines and composite components. Operator Self-Verification programs are applied to improve the overall efficiency and product quality of processes considered mature, as judged by the implementing organization. Operator Self- Verification programs are not stand-alone processes, but augment existing quality management systems. The identified program elements are for voluntary implementation by the organization, and are not intended for contractual flow-down unless otherwise stipulated through contractual agreement.

Aerospace Series Operator Self-Verification Programs Edition P 1

SAE ARP5580-2001 針對非汽車應(yīng)用推薦的失效模式及影響分析(FMEA)實(shí)踐

Recommended Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Practices for Non-Automobile Applications describes the basic procedures for performing a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). It encompasses functional, interface, and detailed FMEA, as well as certain pre-analysis activities (FMEA planning and functional requirements analysis), post-analysis activities (failure latency analysis, FMEA verification, and documentation), and applications to hardware, software, and process design. It is intended for use by organizations whose product development processes use FMEA as a tool for assessing the safety and reliability of system elements, or as part of their product improvement processes. A separate, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, J1739, is intended for use in automobile applications. Purpose: In developing this procedure the subcommittee has endeavored to develop a procedure that reflects the best current commercial practices. This procedure was developed in recognition of todays intense and competitive market demands for high reliability, affordability, and speed to market. The subcommittee had several objectives in defining the FMEA process: 1. Define a basic methodology to include functional, interface, and detailed FMEA. This will facilitate performing the analysis throughout the design process, from early in the conceptual stage to implementation and production. 2. Extend the methodology to include both product and process FMEAs. The methodology can be applied to the many technologies (e.g., mechanical, electrical, software, etc.) used in the development of a product. This helps to facilitate communications between all the parties involved in the development of a system and is useful in a concurrent engineering environment. 1. Provide simple techniques for ranking failure modes for corrective actions and for identifying fault equivalencies. 2. Define the types of information needed for the FMEA in electronic databases, thus facilitating semi-automation of the analysis. 3. Provide procedures for managing the FMEA and for getting the most benefit from the analysis.

Recommended Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Practices for Non-Automobile Applications

ARINC 628P1-3 ITEM 12.0-2001 可靠性

Reliability

Reliability

AECMA TR 3198-2000 航空航天系列.制造商鑒定組合標(biāo)記EN航空產(chǎn)品鑒定

This Technical Report was drawn up by the AECMA-STAN Standardization Committee. The reason which led to the publication of the document as a Technical Report is explained in the foreword.

Aerospace Manufacturers' Identification Monograms and Marks for EN Aerospace Products Serie Aerospatiale Monogrammes Et Marques D'Identification

HB 7592-1998 飛機(jī)非電子系統(tǒng)可靠性增長的試驗(yàn)方法

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了新研飛機(jī)（含直升機(jī)，下同）非電子系統(tǒng)（以下簡稱系統(tǒng)）利用試驗(yàn)進(jìn)行可靠性增長的方法和要求。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)主要適用于新研飛機(jī)在研制階段系統(tǒng)的可靠性增長，在役飛機(jī)系統(tǒng)的可靠性增長也可參照執(zhí)行。

Test method for reliability growth of aircraft non-electronic systems

HB 7501-1997 機(jī)載導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射裝置可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了機(jī)載導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射裝置（以下簡稱發(fā)射裝置）可靠性設(shè)計(jì)的一般要求和詳細(xì)要求。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于機(jī)載導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射裝置的可靠性設(shè)計(jì)，是控制型號可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的主要依據(jù)。具體型號的可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則可根據(jù)需要對本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)剪裁。

Reliability Design Criteria for Airborne Missile Launcher

HB 7500-1997 空空導(dǎo)彈可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了空空導(dǎo)彈可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的一般要求和詳細(xì)要求。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于空空導(dǎo)彈（以下簡稱導(dǎo)彈）的可靠性設(shè)計(jì)，是制定型號可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的主要依據(jù)。具體型號可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則可根據(jù)需要對本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)剪裁。

Air-to-Air Missile Reliability Design Criteria

BS M 89:1996 飛機(jī)地面支持設(shè)備 裝載和維修設(shè)備的穩(wěn)定性要求

1 This International Standard specifies: a) the criteria to be used to determine stability of aircraft loading and servicing equipment, including wind loads; b) the classification of systems recommended to achieve stability; c) the formula to be used for calculating steady-state wind stability; d) the recommended test methods applicable to equipment. 2 The intent of this International Standard is not to specify equipment design, but rather to define uni-form criteria, calculation and testing methods in order to provide a safe work environment under all predict-able circumstances for the users of aircraft loading and servicing equipment. 3 This International Standard specifies the world-wide requirements recognized by aircraft and equip-ment manufacturers as well as airlines and handling agencies. In addition, it shall be applied with due reference to national governmental regulations of the country where the equipment is to be operated. 4 This International Standard applies to aircraft loading and servicing equipment, typically but not exclusively defined as follows: — container and pallet loaders (see ISO 6967 and ISO 6968); — catering trucks (see ISO 10841); — passenger stairs (see ISO 12056); — maintenance and fueling access platforms, when operated in a static position on an aircraft. 5 This International Standard does not apply to: — forklifts; — aircraft de-icers; — any equipment with rotating booms, and more generally any equipment the normal mode of operation of which includes moving in the elevated position.

Aircraft ground support equipment. Stability requirements for loading and servicing equipment

SAE AIR5022-1996 可靠性和安全性過程整合

This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) describes several of the commonly performed Reliability and Safety (R&S) analysis tasks, with emphasis on their inter-relationships and common data elements. This document also describes how the R&S process can be integrated, reducing duplicate work effort and providing more accurate, comprehensive, and standardized analysis results. To illustrate how this integration can be accomplished, several specific reliability and safety tasks are performed on a subsystem of an example product.

Reliability and Safety Process Integration

AECMA TR 3198-1996 航空航天系列.制造商鑒定組合標(biāo)記EN航空產(chǎn)品鑒定

This Technical Report was drawn up by the AECMA Standardization Committee. The reason which led to the publication of the document as a Technical Report is explained in the foreword.

Aerospace Manufacturers' Identification Monograms and Marks for EN Aerospace Products Serie Aerospatiale Monogrammes Et Marques D'Identification

HB 7177-1995 軍用飛機(jī)可靠性維修性外場驗(yàn)證

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了軍用飛機(jī)可靠性、維修性外場驗(yàn)證的基本要求，提出了軍用飛機(jī)可靠性、維修性外場驗(yàn)證的程序和方法。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于所有有可靠性、維修性指標(biāo)要求的軍用戰(zhàn)術(shù)飛機(jī)（含武裝直升機(jī)）整機(jī)、系統(tǒng)、發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)以及由于受條件限制不能在試驗(yàn)室進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證試驗(yàn)的機(jī)載設(shè)備，在研制階段結(jié)束時(shí)，可靠性、維修性指標(biāo)的外場驗(yàn)證。

Field verification of reliability and maintainability of military aircraft

HB 7232-1995 軍用飛機(jī)可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)主要系統(tǒng)（機(jī)體結(jié)構(gòu)除外）在研制階段進(jìn)行可靠性設(shè)計(jì)的要求。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)（殲擊機(jī)），亦適用于殲擊轟炸機(jī)、強(qiáng)擊機(jī)和教練機(jī)的可靠性設(shè)計(jì)，可作為可靠性設(shè)計(jì)、評審的依據(jù)。根據(jù)型號具體特點(diǎn)允許對本準(zhǔn)則進(jìn)行剪裁。

Reliability Design Criteria for Military Aircraft

HB 7254-1995 直升機(jī)可靠性設(shè)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則

本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定了直升機(jī)機(jī)體結(jié)構(gòu)、旋翼尾槳及各系統(tǒng)可靠性設(shè)計(jì)的通用準(zhǔn)則，它是直升機(jī)可靠性設(shè)計(jì)的依據(jù)之一。 　　本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用于各類新研直升機(jī)的可靠性設(shè)計(jì)，也適用于改型直升機(jī)的改動(dòng)部分。在應(yīng)用本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí)，應(yīng)根據(jù)型號特點(diǎn)及有關(guān)文件的規(guī)定對本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行合理裁剪。

Helicopter Reliability Design Criteria